Sourcegraph Cody vs Continue
Sourcegraph Cody provides codebase-aware AI assistance powered by Sourcegraph's code graph with included AI quota. Continue is a fully open-source AI assistant supporting any LLM with tab autocomplete, chat, and agent modes. With Cody Free and Pro being discontinued in July 2025, this comparison helps developers choose between Sourcegraph's enterprise code intelligence and Continue's model-agnostic flexibility.
| Criteria | Cody | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| AI Model | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini | Any LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, local) |
| Pricing | Free / $9/mo Pro / $19/mo Enterprise | Free (OSS) + LLM API costs |
| Code Completion | Inline autocomplete | Tab autocomplete with any model |
| Chat / Agent | Context-aware chat, codebase search | Sidebar chat, inline editing |
| IDE Support | VS Code, JetBrains, Web | VS Code, JetBrains |
| Language Support | All major languages | All major languages |
| Privacy | Enterprise data controls | Full control, runs locally |
| Customization | Custom commands, context filters | config.json, custom slash commands |
Cody vs Continue: In-Depth Analysis
The Cody vs Continue comparison has been reshaped by Sourcegraph's decision to discontinue Cody Free and Pro in July 2025, pushing individual users toward their new Amp product.
Sourcegraph Cody's core advantage is its code graph. When you ask Cody a question, it searches across your entire codebase (and across repositories) to find the most relevant context. Enterprise users get access to Claude Opus, GPT-5, and Gemini models with usage quota included. Cody provides inline autocomplete and context-aware chat. Enterprise Starter costs $19/user/month for up to 50 developers; Enterprise costs $59/user/month for larger teams.
Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. It provides tab autocomplete (using any model, including local Ollama), sidebar chat, Plan mode for structured multi-step changes, and Agent mode for autonomous multi-file refactoring. Configuration lives in a config.json file you can customize extensively. Custom slash commands, context providers, and model routing give Continue unmatched flexibility. The Solo plan is free; Teams costs $10/dev/month.
For individual developers, Continue is now the obvious choice. Cody's free tier is disappearing, while Continue remains free with full feature access. The only cost is your chosen LLM API (or nothing with local models). Continue also supports JetBrains IDEs, which Cody does.
For enterprises, the calculation is different. Sourcegraph's code graph provides cross-repository intelligence that Continue cannot replicate. If your organization has 100+ repositories and needs AI that understands how they connect, Cody Enterprise justified its cost. Continue relies on local context and model capabilities rather than a dedicated code graph.
Key Differences Between Cody and Continue
Codebase Intelligence
Cody uses Sourcegraph's code graph for cross-repository context understanding. Continue relies on local file context and model capabilities without a dedicated code graph.
Pricing Trajectory
Cody Free/Pro are being discontinued (July 2025). Only Enterprise ($19-59/user/month) continues. Continue remains free for individuals, $10/dev/month for teams.
Model Flexibility
Continue supports any LLM including local models via Ollama. Cody Enterprise provides curated access to specific models (Claude Opus, GPT-5, Gemini) with included quota.
Customization
Continue is fully open-source with config.json customization, custom slash commands, and context providers. Cody offers custom commands and context filters within Sourcegraph's framework.
Privacy
Continue can run entirely locally with Ollama models and zero cloud dependency. Cody processes queries through Sourcegraph's infrastructure (Enterprise offers data controls).
Verdict
Cody and Continue serve different segments of the developer market, and Sourcegraph's 2025 changes make this comparison timely. Cody's strength is deep codebase understanding through Sourcegraph's code graph -- it finds relevant context across repositories better than any competitor. But Cody Free and Pro are being discontinued in July 2025, leaving only Enterprise tiers ($19-59/user/month). Continue is fully open-source, supports any LLM including local models, and offers Chat, Plan, and Agent modes at $0 for individuals or $10/dev/month for teams. For individual developers, Continue is now the clear choice since Cody's free option is disappearing. For enterprises with Sourcegraph infrastructure, Cody Enterprise remains unmatched for large multi-repo codebase navigation.
Pros & Cons Compared
Cody
Continue
Pricing Comparison
Cody
FreemiumFree tier with unlimited autocompletes and 200 chats/mo. Pro tier with increased limits and more model options. Enterprise pricing available with single-tenant deployment and advanced governance.
Continue
FreeFree and open-source for individual developers. Teams plan at $10/developer/mo with additional features. You bring your own API keys or use local models.
Shared Language Support
Both Cody and Continue support these languages:
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cody if you...
- Enterprise teams with large multi-repository codebases on Sourcegraph
- Organizations needing cross-repository code intelligence and search
- Teams willing to pay for included AI quota and curated model access
- Companies already invested in Sourcegraph infrastructure
- Enterprises needing managed AI with security controls
Choose Continue if you...
- Individual developers wanting free AI assistance with full flexibility
- Teams preferring open-source tools they can customize and self-host
- Developers wanting to use local models for privacy-sensitive work
- JetBrains users needing AI assistance across multiple IDE platforms
- Budget-conscious teams needing AI at $10/dev/month or less
Switching Between Cody and Continue
If migrating from Cody Free/Pro (being discontinued) to Continue, install Continue in VS Code or JetBrains and configure your LLM provider. Your Cody custom commands translate to Continue slash commands. The main loss is Sourcegraph's code graph context. If moving to Continue from Cody Enterprise, note that cross-repository intelligence has no direct equivalent in Continue.
Sources & Methodology
Comparison outcomes are based on criterion-level scoring, pricing disclosures, official feature documentation, and practical workflow fit across IDE and CLI contexts.
- Cody official website
- Continue official website
- Last reviewed: 2026-02-23
FAQ
Should I switch from Cody to Continue?
If you use Cody Free or Pro, yes -- those plans are being discontinued in July 2025. Continue provides equivalent or better features for free. If you use Cody Enterprise and need cross-repository intelligence, Continue cannot replace that specific capability.
Can Continue match Cody's codebase understanding?
Continue does not have Sourcegraph's code graph, so it cannot match Cody's cross-repository intelligence. For single-repo work, Continue's context handling is comparable.
Is Continue really free?
Continue's software is free and open-source. You pay only for LLM API calls (or nothing if using local models). The Teams plan at $10/dev/month adds shared configurations and analytics.
What is Amp and should I use it instead?
Amp is Sourcegraph's new agentic coding tool replacing Cody Free/Pro. If you valued Cody's search-powered intelligence, explore Amp. If you want open-source flexibility, Continue is better.
Can I run Continue with local models for free?
Yes. Continue works with Ollama and other local model providers. You get full autocomplete, chat, and agent features with zero cloud dependency and zero cost beyond your hardware.